The Tiger
In this whole process I am struck by
the fact that a lot in of the turning points seem to be related to the image of
the Tiger. My first series when I
saw the light spot move was like a Tiger's eye coming into view and that was the
turning point in all of this when I realized that rotating the Velador moved the
laser spot of light.
The study I did a 24 hour mapping of
the laser spot reminded me of a Tigers track and I was trailing
it.
His last episode the peculiar
pattern the laser made on me CCD I have enclosed and it reminds me of a tiger standing there..
On this last series from the short
Velador the image I was analyzing with complex and it was like that four-legged picture. All of the images were like that as I
rotated the Velador in a vertical position. However what I analyze the data I got a circling of the data which was in the same
direction as I rotated the Velador.
This was extremely confusing.
I imagine lying on my back looking at the camera CCD and above that my
map. If I turned the Velador
clockwise the map went clockwise and if it went counterclockwise the map went
counterclockwise. And try to figure
this out and for the most part if I imagined the first spot being marked and
then turning the Velador the CCD the second spot should've been in the opposite
direction of rotation. I imagine
that there was some force pushing on me light from the other side and still that
would not allow the rotations to be the same. No matter which way I tried to figure it
I could not get a rotation of the graph in the same direction. And as you know I try to have the graph
represent the position of the spot on the CCD as you look at it from the laser's
standpoint. This was somewhat of a
nightmare.
If one takes a camera and takes a picture of a man in front of it and the man rotates in
a circle the camera will capture his image as he rotates and the pictures will
show him rotating. Also if the
camera rotates the pictures show the man rotating. Both in sequence move in opposite
directions. If we attached the man
on a bar and then if he rotates or if the camera rotates we get a picture series
that shows a man standing straight up in all of the views.
In a series of images I was
analyzing a little Tiger was not turning.
It was fixed with its feet like on the ground.
And I realized that the construction
of the Velador is such that it removes the common motion that matter is in. C.M.Edwards has certainly done a
lot to rule out other causes that would mimic this effect. Magnetism, EMI, heat and a lot more in
this area.
This was when I realized (and I
guess I knew all of this stuff but I never really appreciated it just used it) I
realized that the image is not attached to the CCD. Despite the bar holding the camera and
laser the image could still shift.
I try to think of a mechanism that would allow this. I came up with the fact that if the
picture consisted of many points like stakes pointing straight up with balloons
attached with strings to the top of the stakes so the bloom could go where it
wanted to that I could explain this.
Then it dawned on me that this is
very similar to what Bradley thought of when he was sailing and noticed that the
top mast were a flag was attached despite the low
turning them flag always pointed the way the wind was blowing. In the article am attaching he used this
in a different way to help explain stellar aberration. Up to now I never realized what he was
talking about when he use that analogy.
Then I realized that your idea of a cross vector product
could fit in here also.
The stick was in its own motion field and the
balloon was in its own motion field and the results were a product
vector.
Bradleys both analogy when the boat
changed its motion its direction the flag did not he likened this to the star
not really changing its position but it was the earth's motion the changed its
position that accounted for stellar aberration.
So that's the fixed CCD laser max
out motion of matter. The light
aberration motion remains. The
image is unattached to the CCD.
Using the stick and below and analogy if the stick is rotating clockwise
then that would explain why the balloon also is moving clockwise. However the Velador max out the motion
of the stick and all we are left is the motion of the
balloon. Now this analogy uses
the wind blowing in a certain direction to move the balloon in the opposite
direction. I am using this just as
an example and don't want to imply that I believe that all that there is an
Aether wind. We don't want to start
by saying that but I'm just using it as an analogy.
My real feeling is that the motion
of the CCD as the receptor of the stars image in stellar aberration is what
determines the shift.
My real feeling is that all of this
could be explained by an ether wind as well as using the motion of the CCD but
getting into an aether will just confuse the whole issue. For instance one of the objections to an
ether is how can it be blowing in multiple directions all at the same time. Well it can't and we don't need
that.
I am explaining this in a verbal and
pectoral manner and rather than me delving into other descriptions I shall let
others do that. I have many
projects I'm doing now and I feel that this one is pretty much wrapped
up.
I called this process Terrestrial
Aberration.
This Web Page Created with PageBreeze Free HTML Editor
